The Five Rules of Risk

20 Մայ % Yթ.-ին
913 627 Դիտումներ

Get your custom domain or email for 10% off at Hover.com/wendover
Listen to Extremities at ExtremitiesPodcast.com
Buy a Wendover Productions t-shirt: standard.tv/collections/wendover-productions/products/wendover-productions-shirt
Subscribe to Half as Interesting (The other channel from Wendover Productions): amwine.info
AMwine: www.AMwine.com/WendoverProductions
Instagram: Instagram.com/sam.from.wendover
Twitter: www.Twitter.com/WendoverPro
Sponsorship Enquiries: wendover@standard.tv
Other emails: sam@wendover.productions
Reddit: Reddit.com/r/WendoverProductions
Animation by Josh Sherrington
Sound by Graham Haerther (www.Haerther.net)
Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster
Music by epidemicsound.com
Select footage courtesy the AP Archive
References:
[1] www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/pedestrian_safety/index.html
[2] www.statista.com/statistics/198029/total-number-of-us-licensed-drivers-by-state/
[3] www.statista.com/statistics/191660/fatality-rate-per-100000-licensed-drivers-in-the-us-since-1988/
[4] www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843304/
[5] www.cmu.edu/epp/people/faculty/research/PS%20FSLRC%20HowSafe.pdf
[6] www-jstor-org.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/stable/pdf/1727970.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ac48a7fe2f9c0fedf29cba859db4daebd
[7] www.cmu.edu/epp/people/faculty/research/PS%20FSLRC%20HowSafe.pdf
[8] journal.sjdm.org/7303a/jdm7303a.htm

Մեկնաբանություններ
  • We got some math wrong. The annual fatality odds for licensed drivers in the US is actually 1 in 6,000 which translates to lifetime odds of about 1 in 75.

    Wendover ProductionsWendover Productions11 ամիս առաջ
    • Right!? I felt like that sounded a bit too crazy.

      Oscar TegbyOscar Tegby3 օր առաջ
    • Excellent video, mostly. A quick comment about the final image in the video: assessing risk requires lots of data gathered over long periods of time. Without such data, good, solid, unambiguous data, it's impossible to assess risk, unless one makes assumptions; which, as you pointed out, are nearly always wrong. So when it comes to a new threat, the risks involved take a very long time to be made clear. "Erring on the side of caution" can be a good and useful rule of thumb, but exactly what "caution" is depends on those very assessments of risk that more often than not are unclear, highly debatable, or open to interpretation. Moreover, as many of these comments show, exactly how one is to interpret statistical data can be complicated in itself, adding further to the difficulty of assessing risk.

      John MannoJohn Manno2 ամիս առաջ
    • I was going to note that one.

      Paulo MartinsPaulo Martins2 ամիս առաջ
    • You also didnt include the incredibly high risk of injury with mountain biking. Just because its not fatal doesnt mean it doesnt carry significant risks. Chopping a finger off probably carries a relatively low risk of death, doesnt mean its safe or that the outcome doesnt matter just because its not death.

      Steezboy3000Steezboy30003 ամիս առաջ
    • I was like Damn I'm never driving again

      TAILƎS LUONGTAILƎS LUONG3 ամիս առաջ
  • 1:11 is that a tesla cybertruck

    benjamin walburnbenjamin walburn16 օր առաջ
  • I'll have you know I'm terrified of being in and driving cars too. That's part of why I hardly go outside these days

    Le FlopLe Flop19 օր առաջ
  • Just the same way I saw testimony of how Austin helped a man make -$50,000 weekly Profit I tried now am also sharing my testimony with over,$10,000 from the company thanks for the good did she has done for me for this short period of time

    Warrior TradingWarrior Trading21 օր առաջ
  • This video fails miserably to take into account the other side to risk: benefit. I know that driving is riskier than mountain biking, but the benefit I get from driving is far greater than the one I get from mountain biking, so I still choose driving because when I put together the risk and benefit of each activity, the net benefit I get from driving is higher than the net benefit of mountain biking. This concept -omitted throughout the entire video- challenges most of the affirmations made by the author, rendering the video useless.

    José IzurietaJosé Izurieta24 օր առաջ
  • This was deep

    Randee RufledtRandee Rufledt29 օր առաջ
  • I don't walk outside

    RyanRyanԱմիս առաջ
  • Conclusion. Life is sus.

    Matthew BittnerMatthew BittnerԱմիս առաջ
  • 1:11 he was hit by a cybertruck

    Alon LavyAlon LavyԱմիս առաջ
  • I appreciate the cyber truck hitting the pedestrian 1:11 LOL that is so funny

    NoThanks OnH.W.NoThanks OnH.W.Ամիս առաջ
  • Why all the dislikes?

    Red Jet 7059Red Jet 7059Ամիս առաջ
  • 1 in 55,000 chance of dying for walking outside is way lower than the 1 in 1 chance of dying of thirst or starvation by never going outside. Also, someone's life could be worth an infinite amount and they would still choose to go outside because by doing so they are participating in their life while wrapping yourself in bubble wrap and hiding in your bath tub to minimize chance of death would mean no longer living your life so at that point you may as well just end it as it is already over. I'm not trying to poke holes in your logic just trying to prove you can't make the messy human experience logical. But if the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is correct then you really don't need to worry since every time you die there will be a world where you didn't and if dead people don't know they're dead then you'll always know you're alive. Although this doesn't save other peoples lives because when they die the version that lived is now in a separate version of your universe, but as long as you are alive you can rest easy knowing you're not dead, and if a version of you has died then you can rest easy not knowing a version of you is still alive.

    Jordan WaltersJordan WaltersԱմիս առաջ
  • You have to take into account skill. Ppl can drive well but bike up and down a mountain poorly. Odds are uniform

    cutscene 1985cutscene 1985Ամիս առաջ
  • Take Australia, fortify into large piles at your borders. Don't over extend. Never attack with just two units unless you must. Plan your attack turns around finishing risk card hands. Always ensure you have a country to take each turn to get a risk card.

    Will KeveWill KeveԱմիս առաջ
  • First minute and I already got Agoraphobia from this vid, lets go!

    Anthony Ege KOPRİAnthony Ege KOPRİԱմիս առաջ
  • jokes on you, im a paraplegic

    Debjit DasDebjit DasԱմիս առաջ
  • Who is worried about walking down a street? The same people who are worried that their pet goldfish might splash water onto the floor and they will slip and die as a result.

    Adrian NelAdrian NelԱմիս առաջ
  • To be fair, the risk of the unknown (at the time, nuclear power) is, well, unknown. Because of ignorance, nuclear power, in their minds, could potentially have the capacity to kill everyone on Earth because the non-experts didn't know enough about it to confidently say otherwise. We accept nuclear power now because there is a more widespread understanding of the actual level of risk (extremely low). If you didn't know anything about nuclear power apart from the name, you would be foolish not to put it on the top of the list because you didn't know enough about it. The scientists on the Manhatten Project gave a non-zero chance of the first atomic bomb igniting the atmosphere, killing everyone on Earth because it was an unknown - people didn't know anything enough about it.

    Alistair McCutcheonAlistair McCutcheonԱմիս առաջ
  • that's the worst possible explanation for risk, sorry but you've confused more people than you've clarified

    Rupesh TashildarRupesh TashildarԱմիս առաջ
  • Here is a very cynical way to see the value of life graph: Some would argue, that when a few unrelated people die on a plane crash or terror attack, then they leave behind many of their closest friends and family in grief, but on the other hand at a genocide there are fewer people in grief left behind, because thes are killed too. Well thats of course an absolute bizarre argument, but just from a rational perspective...

    H TH TԱմիս առաջ
  • What the video fails to mention is that stats (odds) depend on sample sizes. For example, if mountin biking were as common as driving, odds of death my increase.

    AdamdAdamd2 ամիս առաջ
  • You're talking about cars and I'm like I hate cars I know how bad they are and how deadly #anticar so when you said mountain biking and I was like oooh and it was funny with the one in thirty thousand

    Sam RSam R2 ամիս առաջ
  • 2:54 But there are more drivers than there are mountain bikers and more people driving cars than mountain biking at a particular time. So theres a higher chance that someone in a car is going to die because there are more people doing it at a given time. So, comparing mountain biking to driving a car wont work, it should be the car-airplane statistic

    Tyler DoolittleTyler Doolittle2 ամիս առաջ
    • Exactly. This is basic statistics, I'm surprised he made that error

      AdamdAdamd2 ամիս առաջ
  • This mountain biking analogy is wrong. More skilled people choose to mountain bike while driving has a lot more amateurs so it looks like it’s lower accident. Driving is almost required for certain people so it has to be taught. Plus you probably won’t die in a mountain biking accident.

    PhlegethonPhlegethon2 ամիս առաջ
  • amwine.info/town/ambFjm2U2p2Ku7g/video.html

    10K Entertainment10K Entertainment2 ամիս առաջ
  • This guy does not understand suicidal ideation

    J PFJ PF2 ամիս առաջ
  • Your individual risk isn’t accurately captured by any of the generic 1 in X. There are so many variables that influence exactly where you might fall on the spectrum. A human, all things being equal, might have that 1 in X risk but all things are never equal. In an Actuarial sense with a massive sample size these might help you price risk and make money but they’re meaningless to an individual person.

    33moneyball33moneyball2 ամիս առաջ
  • I enjoy your videos however, infinity times zero is zero. 🙄

    Idaho River HouseIdaho River House2 ամիս առաջ
  • No, this episode was bad. The data didn't make sense, and you forgot about conditional probability

    mark wackermanmark wackerman2 ամիս առաջ
  • All calculated risks are models with finite variables. Sample size of mountain bikers, their demographic, their extra carefulness, etc. are distinct from the multitude of drivers +65, sleep deprived, careless. These simplified factored analyses don’t actually answer anything, risk generalized has no effect on the risk of the a single data point/ a single individual.

    MrLlamasKidMrLlamasKid2 ամիս առաջ
  • There is one more thing about risk of driving. It is the amount of hours we spend in that activity. If we go mountain biking a few times a year, and we drive 10hours a WEEK, than comparing year to year is not correct way

    grafknivesgrafknives2 ամիս առաջ
  • That last frame of maskless people amidst a crowd. The irony of it all is that given the level of protection most masks offers isn't all that high - when compared to professional i.e. expensive and scarce alternatives - and when the density of humans per square foot increases past a certain threshold, it's main function becomes not that of protecting the user but the beholder, the neighbour, the fellow citizen, the human right next to you riding the subway that you'll likely never see again in your life - acting as a shield against large particles that me, and you emite at any given time, coughing, sneezing, talking and breathing. Recall a very famous line from "300", as I parafrase "the shield I yield guards not my life, but the life to my left and the shield to my left its left in an unbroken line of shield and spear we stand", something like that, the concept is very much the same. You see I've come to realize that there can never be a point beyond what is already obvious and beyond repair, that if were I to be infected I could actively protect the people with which I have already crossed paths and sown the seeds of desease unknowingly. So I wear a mask proud, I wear it consciously and refrain from taking it off in the proximity of acquaintances and strangers, not because I am a stuck up sheep of sorts like some would say, but because you matter, your loved ones matter, everyone matters. Love your show, thought I'd share. Stay safe.

    Paulo MartinsPaulo Martins2 ամիս առաջ
  • 1/600 seems really high. That mean if someone drives for 60 years they will have a 10% chance of dying from a crash

    Jerry WangJerry Wang2 ամիս առաջ
    • I believe there is mistake in the math by 10x. There are 227 500 000 licensed drivers in the US and 38 800 road fatalities in 2019. 227,500,000÷38,800 = 5863. Odds of death are 1 in 5863 per year. The odds are even lower as these numbers include passangers and pedestrian deaths as well, not just the ones of licensed drivers.

      Andrej NestorovskiAndrej Nestorovski2 ամիս առաջ
  • But i'm sure the rate of non fatal injury is sky high compared to non fatal injury in mountain biking! That's why parents are afraid, not because of the low death rate!

    Gabriel BGabriel B2 ամիս առաջ
  • this hits different in the midst of a pandemic

    NorrotakuNorrotaku2 ամիս առաջ
  • I’ve never been like this... To me, entering a car is far scarier than mountainbiking because I’m aware of the risk, as are most people, yet their actions will reflect the opposite. It’s been my quest for many years now to figure out why everyone I know is so incredibly irrational... I’m not sure I will ever succeed. I guess a more useful question would be why I’m different, but would I want to hear the answer?

    Simon SchulzeSimon Schulze2 ամիս առաջ
  • You did not think about things like, most of car drivers are average person and most of mountain bikers are fucking monster athlete have a bull size of heart to endure stress while biking, so they don't die while do so. Statistics just show correlation, not define the meaning of things.

    thịnh trịnh tuấnthịnh trịnh tuấn2 ամիս առաջ
  • Driver is more dangerous because of other people. That dumass that can't stop checking their phone for the most urgent of things, someone liking their picture or post, or people doing makeup or eating or really anything besides focusing on the road. Mountain biking is basically free from someone else impacting you. Only your actions will effect you, unless your in a densely packed group and someone crashes but I would imagine most keep some distance and have smaller groups if not just being by themselves. Man is the most dangerous game, it is and always will be true.

    Robert AndrewsRobert Andrews2 ամիս առաջ
  • yo Sam I don't walk outside

    GemblyGembly2 ամիս առաջ
  • Came expecting a video about playing the boardgame... left disappointed :(

    RoAnnonRoAnnon2 ամիս առաջ
  • Wait I thought he meant the game risk

    ADUBS animationADUBS animation2 ամիս առաջ
  • Sam taking the risk of making mathematical arguments without applying math properly

    HalbeardHalbeard2 ամիս առաջ
  • Walking outside gives value.

    Etu SukuEtu Suku2 ամիս առաջ
  • The Tesla cyber truck outline I'm gone

    Hannes RodriguezHannes Rodriguez2 ամիս առաջ
  • 1:37 I need someone who's good at geoguessr to tell me where the fuck this place is

    Beat BankBeat Bank2 ամիս առաջ
  • i thought this was about the fckin game :(

    Alex SandersAlex Sanders2 ամիս առաջ
  • 1. Select a color and, depending on the number of players, count out the "armies" you'll need to start the game. 2. Roll one die. Whoever rolls the highest number takes one Infantry piece from his or her pile and places it onto any territory on the board, thus claiming that territory. 3. Starting to the left of the first player, in turn, everyone places one army onto any unoccupied territory. Continue until all 42 territories have been claimed. 4. After all 42 territories are claimed, each player in turn places one additional army onto any territory he or she already occupies. 5. Continue in this way until everyone has run out of armies. There is no limit to the number of armies you may place onto a single territory. 6. Shuffle the pack of RISK cards (maybe, remove the Mission cards) and place the cards face down by the side of the board. This pack forms the draw pile.

    QuirktartQuirktart2 ամիս առաջ
  • Idc, what will happen will happen. Its best to live a good life, not long life

    Ape XApe X2 ամիս առաջ
  • Me inside my house: In terms of risk we have no risk.

    Bálica DávidBálica Dávid2 ամիս առաջ
  • 00:08 - 00:54 My brain explaining to me why i shouldn't exercise

    Electric MidnightElectric Midnight2 ամիս առաջ
  • as a mountain biker, i love the mountain biking example!

    ryan partlanryan partlan3 ամիս առաջ
    • I wouldn't say mountain biking is "Risky" I just can't be bothered with the physical demands of it. #Seriously 😕 : I'm ashamed to say i can't swim a full length of a swimming pool without getting exhausted { anymore } 😓. Although I *WILL* take my risk with swimming at Bondi Beach { or any of my other local ocean beaches } wanting to catch a huge wave trying to catch it in "the barrel" { mouth of the wave } just before it crashes towards the shore. 🏖🏊✅ ⛰🙅🚳

      username1nmillionusername1nmillion24 օր առաջ
  • You got some words wrong, too, sadly. Risk isn't the balance. *Risk is the negatives*. Specifically, it's the product of cost and probability. The positives are "reward". It's balancing the two that humans generally suck at.

    baylinkdashytbaylinkdashyt3 ամիս առաջ
  • I saw the dice and thought this would be about Yahtzee...

    Logan KotterLogan Kotter3 ամիս առաջ
  • "Why do you walk outside?" I don't

    H MericH Meric3 ամիս առաջ
  • Isn't another reason to take risk because there is no other choice - eg. going outside being infinitely bad is still less than starving infinitely bad

    Primoz IvancicPrimoz Ivancic3 ամիս առաջ
  • We also have to take into account there are hundreds of millions of fewer people mountain biking than driving and the type of people who are mountain biking.

    Orange PieOrange Pie3 ամիս առաջ
  • Aren't rules 2 and 5 in contradiction?

    Aaryan JainAaryan Jain3 ամիս առաջ
  • When the video changes your outlook on cars...

    anna ramsanna rams3 ամիս առաջ
  • 2:46 that’s not a cybertruck is it...

    Game FeedGame Feed3 ամիս առաջ
  • Wait there is a risk of 1:55 000 by walking outside???? I don’t think I wanna be outside anymore...

    Game FeedGame Feed3 ամիս առաջ
  • when he talks about getting hit by a car it's a cybertruck.

    Daniel DuVernayDaniel DuVernay3 ամիս առաջ
  • Why I have the impression that many videos are supported by nuclear power industry? On Chernobyl or Fukushima beside direct death of people it was also soil,water and air contamination which increases risk of cancer. Soil will be contami ated for a long time. The same is with climate change, people think of nice weather, but effect can be severe drought

    NicholsZieglerNicholsZiegler3 ամիս առաջ
  • 2:50 there are a lot more people that drive than there are people who mountain bike, so I think the odds could be skewed due to the small sample size, no?

    Nicholas BrassardNicholas Brassard3 ամիս առաջ
  • you should seriously make a RISK VIDEO THAT TEACHES US TO PLAY RISK !!!!! MANY PEOPL THOUGHT THIS WAS HOW TO PLAY THE GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Colton GolobishColton Golobish3 ամիս առաջ
    • @ART ! no i wont theres even dice on the picture

      Colton GolobishColton Golobish3 ամիս առաջ
    • Please calm down it’s his channel

      ART !ART !3 ամիս առաջ
  • What is this, some kind of game theory? Anybody catch the double entendre? Of course they did...everyone on the internet is SUCH A NERD!

    User 007513User 0075133 ամիս առաջ
  • Came for board games. Got existentialism instead

    TwitchyTopHatTwitchyTopHat3 ամիս առաջ
  • I expected this to be about the board game. Disappointed.

    S. Christopher BurfordS. Christopher Burford3 ամիս առաջ
  • you fail to mention that just because ur fighting in vietnam, ur not immune to disease or accident, u just added a diceroll ontop

    ahab_dotaahab_dota3 ամիս առաջ
  • This is way too "Did you know we all have flawed perceptions, you dumb ape" for my liking

    KurboKurbo3 ամիս առաջ
  • With mountain biking you also didn't include the incredibly high risk of injury of mountain biking. Just because theres a low risk of death, doesn't mean it doesn't carry significant risks. Chopping a finger off probably carries a relatively low risk of death, doesn't mean that its safe or that the outcome doesn't matter just because its not death. Any mountain biker will proudly tell you the litany of injuries they've accumulated through the sport. Same with football. Risk of death is low, risk of an injury that follows you around for life is a lot higher.

    Steezboy3000Steezboy30003 ամիս առաջ
  • By living, you risk dying. Every second you live, is another second closer to death. Together, we can stop this.

    SkylonSkylon3 ամիս առաջ
  • Using today's data yes, you are more likely to die driving a car than riding a mountain bike. But if everybody mountain biked as much as they drove I doubt mountain biking would be safer. To put it in other words : I'm willing to bet driving for an hour is less likely to injure or kill me than mountain biking for an hour. Not saying human perception of danger isn't flawed. Just saying driving VS mountain biking is a bad example.

    Lucky LukeLucky Luke3 ամիս առաջ
  • Person A: skydives every day, parkours across volcanoes for fun, dies at 80 Person B: stays at home all day, dies at 30 due to cancer

    TAILƎS LUONGTAILƎS LUONG3 ամիս առաջ
  • 1 in 600. Yeah no. Fix your video

    fivefoottenfivefootten3 ամիս առաջ
    • Read the pinned comment

      CyanCyan3 ամիս առաջ
  • yes, but also the amount of people driving, vs the amount of people riding mountain bikes is radically and unmistakably different.

    Mario GarciduenasMario Garciduenas3 ամիս առաջ
  • Rule 5 is why some people are unwilling to tolerate a slight risk of an allergic reaction to a COVID vaccine but argue that COVID is not killing people faster then they would normally die. No one has died from a vaccine but millions have died from the disease.

    Cameron RogersCameron Rogers3 ամիս առաջ
  • Haven’t watched the video but having read the rule sheet for Risk I’m pretty sure the game has more than 5 rules

    Black BananasBlack Bananas3 ամիս առաջ
  • Comparing driving, a situation where there’s literally millions you Pass each day with hill biking, an event which has a way lower number of people isn’t a good analogy to compare “risk factor”

    Xavier Your SaviorXavier Your Savior3 ամիս առաջ
  • 2:44 cybertruck xD

    Xandar YTXandar YT3 ամիս առաջ
  • lol this video totally called out corona and all the bs now the flawed preseption of risk made for others

    sophia lolisophia loli3 ամիս առաջ
  • With the example of comparing driving and mountain biking: It is not just about death but also about the risk of hurting yourself.

    Sven BroSven Bro3 ամիս առաջ
  • 3:10 - Driving might be more riskier than mountain biking in the sense that you are more likely to get into an accident. But at the same time, since you defined risk in terms of balance of negatives and positives, people are more likely to get more positives out of driving.

    mcv86mcv863 ամիս առաջ
  • The logic in the intro is incorrect and false. It presupposes that one's reason for going outside isn't directly linked in some way to their continued survival, and thus that one is *required* to take on some short term risk in order to guarantee longer term survival. If you wait long enough inside doing nothing, the risk of death becomes so high due to factors such as, you know, starvation, that the risk of going outside is smaller than the risk of staying inside and doing nothing about it. Remember, that you assented that one should choose *never* to go outside. It also completely disregards the notion that one's mental well being is tied directly to their ability to continue their own life and thus in order to preserve one's self at least some level of risk must be accepted or else the risk of serious mental harm and thus eventually of death is also present (I am of course assuming that for the vast majority of people some level of physical and/or social contact is required and not optional). Thus it is entirely false to claim that one cannot value their own life infinitely based on this logic alone, as each time your infinite multiplication is cancelled out by being balanced against infinite value of actions taken with the ultimate outcome of preserving the self. It is true, however, that most people do not value themselves truly infinitely, as there is an inherent concept of 'living a life worth living' for most people. However your logic is just flat wrong.

    DeltariousDeltarious3 ամիս առաջ
  • Damn, I thought this was about the game Risk.

    elweasel2010elweasel20103 ամիս առաջ
  • but you forgot the main thing here, the average person (the vast majority of people) will not know the risk odds so its a null/flawed point. So you are half there.

    DrifytDrifyt4 ամիս առաջ
  • There are some problems with your calculations of perceived risk. But first - our risk perception is NOT flawed. It works as intended but it is suited for life in nature not in civilization. That explains almost everything bizarre about it. 1. Walking outside - in the nature walking has risk but this risk is small if you are in a familiar area - you know if there are predators or other dangers. In the nature there aren't fast moving 2 tonne objects to crush you. Loud car sounds aren't natural - you can recognize a galloping predator by its distinct noise. In our streets the noise is normal so we don't pay attention to it and the environment feels safe. 2. Mountain biking vs driving a car on the roads - moving fast with your body basically exposed in Rocky hills is definition of danger in the nature. There is very high risk of getting injuries. Remember we perceive and asses the risk of injuries too not just death. Braking a leg in the nature is almost equal to dying - you can't move, find water, food or shelter and you are guaranteed to die if there is no one to help you which was probably the case back in the ancient times. In a car you are protected by the vehicle from some injuries which gives a sense of security. I had two car crashes with both vehicles totalled and I had absolutely no injuries. Also the calculations are skewed by the level of professionalism in both activities - regular mountain bikers are much more experienced in this activity than drivers. People drive of necessity but ride bikes because of passion and that pushes them to get better. Also if you don't feel good you don't go biking but you drive around. And you drive every day opposed to biking which you plan ahead and do only whenever you want it. If you look in the statistics and compare the risk of driving a motorcycle and a car you will see that pretty much lines up with our natural perception of risk. 3. The diminishing perceived tragedy of large number of people dying. People don't have a natural sense of scale for large numbers. It is really hard for someone to imagine a million people but far less so to imagine 50. Also as you mentioned with increased death count every life becomes less valuable. 4. Perceived risk of unknown - it makes a lot of sense in the nature. In unknown terrain you don't know what and where are the dangers to you. If you go back to the walking on the streets you feel more safe in your town/city/village even in the dark backstreets rather than in a foreign place where you tend to stick to main roads and avoid unknown streets and roads.

    Sedat MehmedSedat Mehmed4 ամիս առաջ
  • “Why do you walk outside?” Me, an introvert: I don’t have such weaknesses

    David GonzalesDavid Gonzales4 ամիս առաջ
  • 2/8 of the references work (1 needs ID, 5 are 404 error) -.-

    Sat SSATSat SSAT4 ամիս առաջ
  • this video makes me want a nice cool bRisk

    mwmwmwmwmmdwmwmwmwmwmmdw4 ամիս առաջ
  • Living is the leading cause of death.

    DarkPope666DarkPope6664 ամիս առաջ
  • Funny, talking about going outside while in Corona times.

    IAmPattycakesIAmPattycakes4 ամիս առաջ
  • When I hear someone say: "If we can save only one life we should..." followed by some asinine restriction, I want to reach for my revolver.

    floxy20floxy204 ամիս առաջ
  • Hey AMwine thanks for recommending me this after I missed getting hi by a car from 1 metres

    Aaron LoosenAaron Loosen4 ամիս առաջ
  • I actually agree with this. Bruh

    MadtrackMadtrack4 ամիս առաջ
  • "Voluntary risk" of driving. Hahahahahaha. Americans really delude themselves thinking they can go outside in their sprawling isolation country without driving. You have, like, 3 trains, 5 buses and 1 tram in the whole entire country of over 300 million people. And uber costs an arm and a leg, you're not gonna use it to go to the convenience store or commute to work every day.

    phonvoli ormogweyphonvoli ormogwey4 ամիս առաջ
  • I am so amused with the idea of _1:600 chance of death-vending machine_

    Emir ErcanEmir Ercan4 ամիս առաջ
  • The mountain biking example is misleading. The statistic of death is so low BECAUSE its regarded as being dangerous whereas driving doesn't have the same level of deterrence. Which means only careful and skilled people mountain bike whereas people of all skill levels drive. If people of all skill levels mountain biked I can assure you there would be quite a bit more deaths.

    EsotericBeepEsotericBeep4 ամիս առաջ
  • Shit man. Thought i was going to learn how to play Risk.

    Arthur RamosArthur Ramos4 ամիս առաջ
  • Ah yes the graphic at 9:30 theres where the multi rail drift comes in

    StillSaltyStillSalty4 ամիս առաջ
  • Is it normal that I initially thought it was the board game

    Julian JetJulian Jet4 ամիս առաջ
AMwine